APSA Solutions Made Simple

Alexandria Patient Safety Alliance-Solutions Made Simple (APSA-SMS) program aims at creating wide spread awareness and successful implementation of the Egyptian patient safety standards as mentioned in the standards for Hospital published by the Ministry of Health.

APSA will present guidance on how to implement and audit these standards. Each APSA-SMS will include a short action plan for the implementation of the standards, audit forms to evaluate success of implementation and an educational slide show that could be used for educational purposes. These documents are presented in Arabic to ensure widest implementation among healthcare providers.

Implementation tool

This tool has been designed to help in implementing APSA Solutions Made Simple. The tool is based on the PDSA (Plan - Do - Study - Act) quality improvement cycle. The PDSA cycle offers a route for systematic implementation and improvement. Often the patient safety standard cannot be achieved in one cycle, and so the cycle is repeated. Even if the desired aim is achieved a new aim is defined and the cycle repeated. With each new cycle improvement in patient safety standards will be achieved and so on.

  APSA - SMS implementation tool

Solutions Made Simple

Patient identification

  Egyptian patient safety standards-PS3
   
تستخدم طريقتان على الأقل للتعرف على المريض عند إعطاءه علاج أو عند نقل دم أو احد مشتقاته أو عند اخذ عينة دم منه أو أى عينات أخرى لازمة للتحاليل الطبية أو عند إعطاء أى علاجات أخرى أو عند اتخاذ أى إجراءات
  Patient indentification solution
    Patient identification - SMS
  Patient indentification audit tool
    For medical record and wrist band assessment
    For petient identification process assessmentl
    For knowledg assessment
  Patient indentification slide show
    Patient identification educational slide show
  Patient indentification forum
  Eman El-Sayed, Eman El-Sonbaty, Fatma Hamdy, Nabil Dowidar

Hand Hygiene

  Egyptian patient safety standards-PS4
 
يتم تطبيق دليل نظافة الأيدى والقوانين واللوائح الخاصة بنظافة الأيدى السارية والمنشورة حاليا لمنع العدوى المتعلقة بالرعاية الصحية
  Hand hygiene solution
    Hand hygiene - SMS
  Hand hygiene audit tools
    For equipment assessment
    For knowledge assessment
    For compliance assessment
  Hand hygiene posters
 
These posters are designed to be printed in A4 size using black and white laser printers, enlarged into A3 size through photocopying, laminated and then fixed in designated areas according to the hand hygiene solution recommendations.
    Five moments
    Six steps
  Hand hygiene slide show
    Hand hygiene educational slide show
  Hand hygiene forum
 
Azza Abd El-Shaheen, Bothayna El-Said, Elham Morsy, Elham Mohamed, Eman El-Sayed,Eman El-sonbaty, Enas El-Agami, Fatmah Hamdy, Hesham Saad El-din, Karima El-Sayed, Magda Essawy, Mervat Hussien, Mona Salem, Mostafa Nour El-Din, Nabil Dowidar, Osama Belal, Reham El-Feky, Salwa Abu Zeid, Samaa Zenhom, Soad Farid, Tarek Omar.

Injection Safety

  Egyptian patient safety standard - ps 5
   
يتم التخلص من السرنجات ذات الاستخدام الواحد بعد استخدامها لمنع العدوى المتعلقة بالرعاية الصحية
  Injection safety solution
    Injection safety - SMS
  Injection safety audit tools
    For knowledge assessment
    For compliance assessment in patient wards, diagnostic and therapeutic intervention rooms including operating rooms
  Injection safety alerts
  Safety alerts are designed to be printed in A4 size using black and white laser printers and distributed to all wards and intervention rooms. The alert could also be enlarged to A3 size and laminated and displayed accordingly.
    Alert - 1
  Injection safety slide show
    Injection safety educational slide show
  Injection safety eForum
  Ahmed Awad, Azza Hussein, Basma Azaz, Elham Morsy, Eman El-Sayed, Eman El-Sonbaty, Fatma Hamdy, Gihan Nabil, Maha El-Touny, Mona Salem, Nabil Dowidar, Nahla Kandil, Rania El-Watidy, Reham El-Asady, Sally Abd El-Raouf.

Panic values

  Egyptian patient safety standard – PS 6
   
توجد قائمة بكافة الفحوص التى لها قيم / نتائج فحص حرجة وتحدد قيم / نتائج الفحوص الحرجة لكل فحص
  APSA panic values
    Table of panic values
  Egyptian patient safety standard – PS 7
  يتم تطبيق عملية محددة لتلقى الأوامر الشفهية أو التليفونية أو لتقديم تقرير عن نتائج الفحوص الحرجة، والتي تتطلب توضيح ( إعادة القراءة) الأمر بأكمله أو نتيجة الفحص من الشخص المتلقي المعلومات.
  Panic values reporting solution
         Panic values-SMS
  Panic values reporting audit tools
         For konwledge assessment
         For assessment of essentials and reporting process
  Panic values slide show
         Panic values educational slide show
  Panic values eForum
 
Ahmed Awad, Al Shaima Ismail, Amr Aly, Eman El-Sonbaty, Eman Wagdy, Gihan Mohmoud, Magda Abo Ollo ,Mahmoud Ragab, Mohamed Ibrahim, Mohamed Salem, Mohsen George, Nabil Dowidar, Nagwa Metwally ,Rania Diab, Sahar Helmy .

Tube misconnection

  Egyptian patient safety standard – PS 8
     
.يتم تطبيق نظم لمنع الإتصال الخاطئ أو إنفكاك جميع أنواع الأنابيب والقساطر
  Tube misconnection solution
    Tube misconnection – SMS
    Tube misconnection – determination
    Tube misconnection – risk assessment
    Tube misconnection – risk matrix
    Tube misconnection – catheter map
  Tube misconnection audit tools
             For konwledge assessment
             For process assessment
  Tube misconnection slide show
             Tube misconnection educational slide show
  Tube misconnection eForum
 
Abd El-Fatah Bassiouny, Eman El-Sonbaty, Eman El-Sayed, Fatma Hamdy, Hadil Galal, Magda Abo Ollo, Mohamed Selima, Mohsen George, Nabil Dowidar, Shaimaa Abd El-Aal .

Fall prevention

  Egyptian patient safety standard – PS 9
     
يتم تقييم إحتمال خطر سقوط كل مريض، بما في ذلك الخطر المحتمل و المرتبط بعلاج المريض ويعاد هذا التقييم على فترات منتظمة.
  Egyptian patient safety standard – PS 10
     
يتم إتخاذ إجراءات لتقليل أي مخاطر محددة لسقوط المريض أو لمنعها.
  Fall prevention solution
    Fall prevention – SMS
    Fall prevention – care plan
  Fall risk assessment
    Morse scale
    STRATIFY scale
    Medication scale
    Delirium scale
  Patient and public education
    Educational leaflet
  Fall prevention audit tools
    For knowledge assessment
    For management assessment
    For frontline assessment
  Fall prevention slide show
    Fall prevention educational slide show
  Fall prevention team
    Eman El-Sonbaty, Eman El-Sayed, Nabil Dowidar, Taha Rady.

Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA)


FMEA is the analysis of a process to identify the possible ways it might fail (failure mode), the effects of these failures, and possible causes of these failures.

FMEA steps

  1. Form of  a multidisciplinary team
  2. Select a high risk process for analysis
  3. Describe and map the process
  4. Identify ways in which the process could fail (fail to perform its desired function)
  5. Identify the possible effects of each failure
  6. Identity any controls already in place for failure detection
  7. Prioritize the various failures identified
  8. Determine causes of failures identified
  9. Redesign the process to minimize the risk of failures and their effects on patients
  10. Pilot, implement, and audit the redesigned process

Step 1Multidisciplinary Team 
To guarantee a successful outcome from FMEA the formation of a multidisciplinary team is essential. Keep the number small around 5 – 7 individuals. Teams usually include physicians, nurses, risk managers or patient safety managers in addition to any other specialty related to the process to be analyzed. Pharmacists when dealing with medication safety, surgeons when dealing with surgical safety, blood bank technicians when dealing with blood transfusion safety, etc.

Step 2Selecting the process
The process is usually chosen from hospital information on adverse or sentinel events or from recommendations produced by patient safety organizations (see risk identification).


Step 3Map the process 
It is essential for the success of FMEA that all members of the team understand the process to be analyzed. In doing so, the process is traced from its point of initiation until its completion. It is also advisable to break down the process into its components parts. Skills related to drawing flow charts are most helpful in this step. Below are some basic shapes that are used in the construction of a flow chart.

Step 4Failure Mode 
Evaluate each component of the process and determine what could go wrong with the related process. This step can be done through a series of “What if” questions and brainstorming between team members in order to define the various potential failures in the process and how often do they occur (see risk analysis).


Step 5Effect Analysis 
The effects of each failure have to be determined and their impact on patients or the organization defined (see risk analysis).


Step 6Controls
The same is performed for the identification of any controls or safeguards already in place that help in the detection of each failure mode identified (see risk analysis).
FMEA sheet I can be used with step 4 to step 6.


Step 7Prioritization
Prioritize the failure modes identified using the criticality index (see risk evaluation and FMEA sheet II) to identify those that pose the greatest threat to patients or the organization.  If a large number of failure modes are identified, it is more effective to address the highest rated failure modes initially. The rest of failure modes are addressed later in descending order. Solutions to the failure modes with the high ranking may be also solutions to less significant failure modes. Some organizations establish a “cut-off” criticality index to establish which failure modes will be addressed.


Step 8Causes
Determine through open discussion possible causes and predisposing factors for the identified failures. The use of Reason’s error diagram or a fish bone diagram may help in the  analysis.


Step 9Improvement 
For each failure mode selected identify actions required to decrease the corresponding criticality index which should lead to one or more of the following:

  1. Decrease the likelihood of the failure to occur
  2. Minimize harm resulting from the failure
  3. Increase probability of its detection before reaching the patient

Step 10PDSA cycle 
Once improvement steps have been identified an action plan is developed to implement the suggested improvements. Before full scale implementation it is advisable to pilot the new action plan. After full scale implementation data is recollected and analyzed to make sure that the improvements introduced have lead to an increase in the process safety (decrease in Criticality Index).

 failure mode effect analysis sheet